Skip to main content

About

Last updated: April 16, 2026

What This Site Is

Decoded Korea is an independent publication that analyzes Korean cosmetic ingredients, chemical substances, and regulatory data. We translate structured regulatory information — ingredient lists, classification standards, cross-country comparisons — into readable analysis for cosmetic professionals, regulatory affairs specialists, developers, and curious consumers.

The site is built around one observation: Korean regulatory databases are rich, detailed, and maintained at a high standard, but much of the data is difficult to access for non-Korean speakers. Language barriers, fragmented source systems, and authentication requirements keep most of this information inside the Korean market. Decoded Korea exists to bridge that gap.

Who Runs It

Decoded Korea is run by a Korea-based IT professional with a background in data systems and regulatory data pipelines. The site started as a side project after building structured APIs for Korean cosmetic and chemical regulatory data — the publishing arm grew out of the work already being done with the data.

We operate as a small independent publication. No VC funding, no editorial team of freelancers, no AI content farm. Articles are researched against real regulatory databases and verified against official government sources before publication.

The Data Behind the Site

Every article on Decoded Korea is sourced from structured databases we maintain. The underlying data comes from official Korean and international regulatory sources, organized into two primary datasets:

K-Beauty Cosmetic Ingredients Database

  • 21,796 cosmetic ingredients with INCI names, Korean names, CAS numbers, EC numbers, and origin definitions
  • 30,960 regulatory records across 10 countries: Korea, EU, Japan, China, Taiwan, ASEAN, US, Canada, Brazil, Argentina
  • Ingredient purpose classifications (UV filter, preservative, surfactant, colorant, etc.)
  • Country-specific regulatory status: banned, restricted, permitted with conditions
  • Maximum concentration limits per country
  • Use-type restrictions (face vs. body, leave-on vs. rinse-off)
  • Source: Korea MFDS (KCIA + MFDS merged), cross-referenced with EU Cosmetics Regulation EC 1223/2009 (Annex II–VI), and corresponding regulations in other jurisdictions.

Available via the K-Beauty Cosmetic Ingredients API on RapidAPI.

K-REACH Chemical Substance Database

  • 47,000+ chemical substances registered under Korea's K-REACH framework
  • Substance identifiers: CAS numbers, KE numbers, molecular formulas, synonyms (English and Korean)
  • GHS (Globally Harmonized System) hazard classifications with hazard codes and precaution codes
  • Regulatory designations: toxic substance, restricted substance, prohibited substance, priority management substance, accident preparedness substance, persistent pollutant, CMR substance, Rotterdam Convention substance
  • Source: Korea Ministry of Environment and Korea Environment Corporation public data, sourced through official data.go.kr APIs.

Available via the K-REACH Chemical Substance API on RapidAPI.

What Kind of Content You'll Find

  • Ingredient analysis — deep dives on individual cosmetic ingredients: mechanism, regulatory status across markets, concentration limits, use conditions.
  • Regulation comparisons — how the same substance is regulated differently across Korea, the EU, Japan, China, ASEAN, and other markets.
  • Regulatory news — when MFDS, EU, or other major authorities issue new restrictions or ban substances, we cover what changed and what it means.
  • Consumer-facing explainers — for readers who want to understand ingredient labels, regulatory philosophy, and how global cosmetic regulations actually work.
  • Developer guides — occasional technical content on using the APIs programmatically.

Editorial Standards

  • Data verification — every regulatory number, ban date, and concentration limit is cross-checked against the underlying database and, when applicable, against the official government publication.
  • No sponsored content — we do not accept payment to mention products, brands, or ingredients.
  • No medical claims — we report regulatory and scientific information. We do not recommend products for specific health conditions.
  • Corrections policy — if we get something wrong, we welcome corrections at decodedkorea.lab@gmail.com and will update the affected article with a note.

Not Affiliated With

Decoded Korea is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by any government regulatory authority, cosmetic brand, chemical manufacturer, or industry association. We are an independent analytical publication.

Contact

For corrections, tips, inquiries, or partnership questions:

Email: decodedkorea.lab@gmail.com

Links

Comments

New comments are not allowed.

Popular posts from this blog

Sunscreen UV Filters: A 10-Country Comparison

A sunscreen formulated for sale in Seoul cannot always be sold as-is in New York, Paris, or São Paulo. Each country maintains its own list of permitted UV filters, and the lists rarely match. A filter that is legal at 10% in one market may be banned in the next, or capped at 5%, or allowed only in specific product types. We mapped UV filter approvals across 10 markets — the EU, Korea, Japan, China, Taiwan, ASEAN, the US, Canada, Brazil, and Argentina — using a structured database of 21,796 cosmetic ingredients with 30,960 regulatory records. Below is what the data shows. What every country agrees on Two UV filters are approved in all 10 markets: Zinc Oxide — mineral filter, broad spectrum (UVA + UVB) Titanium Dioxide — mineral filter, UVB and partial UVA These are the only filters with universal approval. Any formulation designed to sell identically across all 10 markets without reformulation must rely on these two ingredients. This is why most global brands lead with minera...
Post a Comment
Read more

Banned in Europe, Legal in Korea: 5 Ingredients That Split Global Regulators

The same moisturizer that sits on a shelf in Seoul could be pulled from a store in Paris. Not because of a labeling error or a packaging defect — but because an ingredient inside is classified differently by two governments looking at the same scientific data. This happens more often than most consumers realize. The EU and South Korea — both major cosmetics markets with sophisticated regulatory systems — frequently disagree on where to draw the line. The EU's cosmetics regulation (EC 1223/2009) maintains one of the strictest banned substance lists in the world, with over 1,600 entries in Annex II. Korea's MFDS takes a different approach, often allowing the same ingredients under specific concentration limits or without restriction. Neither system is wrong. They operate under different regulatory philosophies: the EU leans toward the precautionary principle — restrict first, revisit later. Korea tends toward risk management — allow under controlled conditions, monitor outcomes...
Post a Comment
Read more

Are Parabens Really Banned? We Checked 10 Countries.

"Paraben-free" is one of the most common claims on skincare packaging. It is on drugstore moisturizers, high-end serums, and K-Beauty toners. The message: parabens are bad, and this product does not have them. But if parabens are so dangerous, why has no country banned them outright? We queried our regulatory database covering 10 countries and found that not a single one prohibits all parabens. What parabens actually are Parabens are a family of preservatives derived from para-hydroxybenzoic acid. They prevent bacteria and mold from growing in cosmetic products. Without preservatives, a jar of moisturizer would become a petri dish within weeks. The most common parabens in cosmetics are Methylparaben, Ethylparaben, Propylparaben, and Butylparaben. These four have been used in cosmetics for decades. There are also less common variants — Isopropylparaben, Isobutylparaben, and others — that have a different regulatory status. The concern around parabens started with a 2004 ...
Post a Comment
Read more