In the MFDS export-market data, 535 cosmetic ingredients carry a concentration limit or condition in both Korea and the EU. For a formulator taking a Korean product to Europe, most of that overlap is uneventful: where the two maximum concentrations can be read on the same basis, they are usually identical. The differences that matter are fewer and easy to miss. Some are EU limits lower than Korea's, set for a product type or a sub-group that the Korean entry does not separate. Others are ingredients Korea still allows up to a limit and the EU has moved to its list of prohibited substances. This post sets out both, with the Korean rule text from MFDS Notice No. 2026-19 and the EU entries from CosIng and EUR-Lex. Where both markets set a limit For 258 of the 535 ingredients, each Korean maximum could be paired with an EU maximum for the same product type. In 247 of them the numbers are the same. Many of these come from shared group entries: 118 ingredients fall under the entry ...
Until August 2025, Korean chemical law kept a single list of toxic substances. A mixture became a toxic substance once a listed ingredient passed a set concentration, and that concentration was low enough to catch everyday products. Under the old rules, a mixture containing 0.1 percent benzene counted as toxic, which put gasoline, at roughly 0.7 percent benzene, under the same controls as far more dangerous materials. On August 7, 2025, the revised Act on the Registration and Evaluation of Chemicals (K-REACH) replaced that single category with three hazard categories, each with its own concentration threshold for mixtures. We counted every designation in the current public data to see where the substances ended up. What the three categories mean Human acute hazard covers substances that can harm health after a single or short exposure. Human chronic hazard covers harm from repeated exposure, or harm that shows up after a latency period. Ecological hazard covers harm to aquatic or...